The recent announcements by Israel and Hamas of the deal to free  Sergeant Gilad Shalit — and his release on Tuesday — have been met by  mostly joy in Israel, and by reasonable people of all faiths and  nationalities all over the world, but also with trepidation about the  repercussions of releasing so many murderers in exchange for Shalit.
Hamas and Israel have long been  bitter enemies. Hamas’ fundamental denial of Israel’s existence, indeed  of even its right to exist, has been a major obstacle to the negotiation  of a meaningful and enduring peace between Israel and the Palestinians.
Hamas has demanded that Israel  release many hundreds of convicted Palestinian terrorists who have been  involved with the murder of innocent Israeli citizens. And while the  Israelis have been reluctant for more than five years to release  Palestinian prisoners guilty of murdering Israelis by terrorist attacks,  Hamas has continued to violate the basic human rights of Shalit ever  since his abduction. Hamas has refused to grant visitation rights to  Israeli officials and to the international Red Cross, and has even  refused to provide proof of his still being alive and healthy. This  further underscores and exposes the central Hamas doctrine of terror and  murder and the striking lack of respect by Hamas for any meaningful and  moral peace process with Israel.
The exchange of Shalit for more than  1,000 convicted Palestinian prisoners serving sentences in Israeli  prisons is no victory for peace. While this deal is being greeted with  joy by Israelis, they also reserve their celebrations knowing that many  of those to be released are Palestinian terrorists who will probably  return to their previous groups and continue terrorism. Israeli media  have reported that many families of Israeli victims are devastated by  the release of these murderers. CNN reports that an Israeli association  of terror victims quote that 180 Israelis were killed by terrorists who  had been freed in a previous deal in 2000. They also quote that of 238  terrorists freed in a 1985 deal, 48 per cent returned to terrorism and  were recaptured by Israeli forces.
Indeed, this has been a most  difficult moral dilemma for the Israeli government to confront. Israeli  governments have had to struggle with this dilemma since Shalit was  kidnapped by Hamas. For several years successive governments have been  reluctant to release terrorists in exchange for Shalit, but Israelis  place high value on the lives of each of its citizens. And because of  this code, they now have agreed to release many of the most notorious of  the Palestinian terrorists to gain release of their young innocent  soldier.
In contrast, Syrian-based Hamas  leader Khaled Mashaal was reported by the CBC to have pledged “that  those released will return to … the national struggle,” confirming for  many seeking peace that Hamas views this deal as nothing more than  renewal of its brand of terror and murder. The CBC also quoted Mashaal  to have said that the released prisoners would include 315 who have been  serving life sentences, suggesting they were convicted of attacks that  were directly responsible for the deaths of Israelis. 
Mashaal went on to  note that “This is a national achievement for the whole Palestinian  people.” And yet, despite Hamas’ assertion that terrorists released from  Israeli prisons will be welcomed as heroes and return to the national  struggle, but makes no mention of peace, Israel has demonstrated its  value for human life. They offered over a thousand convicted  Palestinians in exchange for the life of one Israeli soldier, who was  kidnapped at the age of 19 from Israeli territory by Hamas.
True political leadership measures  its success by seizing opportunities to make the world a better place;  by replacing terror with hope and fear with vision. Hamas has an  extraordinary opportunity to convert this deal to a gesture of peace,  but instead seems to be choosing endorsement of its brand of terror.  It’s not hard to understand why Israel, which continues to be ready to  sit and negotiate a two-state solution with the Palestinians, is so torn  about trusting whom they might be negotiating with.
Former Israeli prime minister Golda  Meir famously stated “We can forgive the Arabs for killing our children.  We cannot forgive them for forcing us to kill their children. We will  only have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than  they hate us.”


 










